Last May, UESF held a rally as an early stage of our contract campaign. About 700 people turned out, as I recall, and many of them were really angry about the Sped staffing consolidations that had just been announced at many school sites. This was a burning issue for many UESF members. How could SFUSD justify reducing support for the most vulnerable students, when it was already impossible to provide them with the services they needed with the resources provided? SpEd teachers and paras often make up the difference by just working even harder! Anyone who has worked in a school knows that the SpEd teachers jobs are insanely difficult and every year they get harder, and now the district was reducing para support as well!
Here is a cropped image of the spreadsheet comparing the staffing numbers for the two years, with some lines hidden to make it fit in a screenshot. The full spreadsheet and the original data file are linked here.
The “job code desc” that are listed in the data file can’t be actual job positions because there weren’t 2789 paras working in SFUSD last year. Again it seems that SFUSD has found a way to answer my query while kind of muddying the answer. Any help and suggestions are welcome.